Built to order

Multi-Agent AI System using LangGraph

A team of cooperating AI agents — researcher, planner, critic — orchestrated with LangGraph to autonomously complete complex tasks like startup idea validation, all watched from a Streamlit control room. The fastest-growing 2026 keyword with zero kit-seller competition: a genuine first-mover page.

Illustrative mockup of the Multi-Agent AI System using LangGraph control room.
More project photos (2)

The problem

Single-prompt chatbots are 2023. The 2026 skill employers ask about is agentic AI — teams of specialized AI agents that plan, research, critique, and refine work autonomously. This project builds one with LangGraph: a Researcher agent gathers information with web search and RAG, a Planner agent structures it into a plan, and a Critic agent challenges weaknesses until the output passes quality gates — all visible in a Streamlit control room showing the live agent graph, message flow, and intermediate artifacts. "AI agent final year project" is the fastest-growing keyword on our SEO list with essentially zero kit-seller competition. First-mover pages win.

How it works

How it works:

  1. The user submits a mission (e.g., "validate this startup idea") in the control room.
  2. LangGraph routes the mission through the agent graph: Researcher gathers evidence via search and RAG, Planner structures findings, Critic evaluates against quality rubrics.
  3. Failed critiques loop back with specific feedback; the graph iterates until quality gates pass or max iterations hit.
  4. Every agent step, tool call, and message is logged and visualized live in the control room.
  5. The final artifact (validation report / literature review) is exported with its full trace — the evidence trail examiners love.

Project features

Features:

  • Three cooperating agents — Researcher, Planner, Critic — orchestrated as a LangGraph state machine
  • Researcher uses web search + RAG over uploaded documents for grounded information gathering
  • Planner decomposes goals into structured task plans with dependencies
  • Critic scores drafts against rubrics and sends them back for revision loops
  • Streamlit control room: live agent graph, inter-agent messages, token usage, and artifacts
  • Two demo missions included: startup idea validation and literature-review assistant
  • Human-in-the-loop checkpoints: approve or redirect agents mid-run
  • Run history with full trace logs for the report and viva walkthrough

What is included

What's included:

  • Complete source code (agent definitions, graph, control room)
  • Two ready demo missions with sample outputs
  • Project report PDF (synopsis, agentic-AI literature, architecture, evaluation, conclusion)
  • Presentation PPT for review/demo day
  • Viva Q&A sheet covering agents vs chains, LangGraph concepts, RAG, and evaluation of agent systems
  • Setup guide (API keys, local-LLM option, running missions)

Limitations & prerequisites

Limitations:

  • Agent runs consume LLM API tokens; the guide includes cost-control settings and a local-LLM (Ollama) option to run free
  • Output quality depends on the underlying LLM — the architecture, not any single model, is the project
  • Multi-agent loops can be slow (minutes per mission); the control room shows progress live
  • Web-search grounding needs internet; offline mode restricts the researcher to uploaded documents
  • Evaluation of agent systems is an open research area — the report uses task-completion rubrics honestly
Components & software requirements

Tech stack:

  • Python 3.10+
  • LangGraph (agent orchestration, state machines)
  • LangChain (tooling, chains, document loaders)
  • LLM API (OpenAI-compatible; local LLM option documented)
  • FAISS/Chroma (RAG vector store)
  • Tavily/DuckDuckGo search API (researcher web access)
  • Streamlit (control room UI)

Download abstract (PDF)

Related guides

All guides
Technical illustration of a cloud server pushing event envelopes outward to web application endpoints for payments, dashboards and chat.Web development and IoT students who have built a REST API or an ESP32 project and now need external services (payments, GitHub, messaging) to notify their app when things happen

Webhooks Explained: Receive Data from Payments, GitHub and IoT

A webhook lets a service call your server the moment an event happens — payments, code pushes, form submissions. This guide explains the event anatomy, HMAC signature verification, the fast-acknowledge reliability pattern, local testing, and how webhooks compare with polling, WebSockets and SSE.

Read guide
Illustration of object tracking showing video frames with bounding boxes and persistent ID labels following people and vehicles, comparing motion prediction and appearance matching.B.E./B.Tech Computer Science and Electronics students building video analytics projects — people counting, vehicle tracking, sports analysis — who have detection working and need

Object Tracking: DeepSORT and ByteTrack Explained

Detection finds objects per frame; tracking keeps their identities across frames. This guide explains tracking-by-detection, Kalman motion models, DeepSORT's appearance embeddings vs ByteTrack's low-confidence box recovery, tracking metrics (HOTA, IDF1, ID switches), and the tuning parameters that determine real-world quality.

Read guide
Illustration of image segmentation showing U-Net's U-shaped encoder-decoder with skip connections producing pixel masks, alongside Mask R-CNN detecting instances with masks.B.E./B.Tech Computer Science and AI/ML students moving from image classification or detection to pixel-level understanding — medical imaging, defect detection, autonomous driving

Image Segmentation: U-Net and Mask R-CNN

When projects need pixel-level answers, segmentation delivers. This guide explains semantic vs instance vs panoptic segmentation, U-Net's encoder-decoder with skip connections, Mask R-CNN's parallel mask head, Dice and IoU evaluation, paired augmentation, and how to choose the right architecture for your data and question.

Read guide
Get a quotation